Difference between revisions of "Talk:optiPoint 150 S"
The Wiki of Unify contains information on clients and devices, communications systems and unified communications. - Unify GmbH & Co. KG is a Trademark Licensee of Siemens AG.
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hello Gunnar, | Hello Gunnar, | ||
| − | If looking at [[PoE classes | + | If looking at [[optiPoint power supply and PoE classes]] the [[optiPoint 150 S]] is correctly reported. |
I think we could also state that [[optiPoint 150 S]] is IEEE 802.3af PoE compliant (Class 2 with 3.84-6.49 W power requirements) in its wiki page (Actually it's not declared). | I think we could also state that [[optiPoint 150 S]] is IEEE 802.3af PoE compliant (Class 2 with 3.84-6.49 W power requirements) in its wiki page (Actually it's not declared). | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 25 September 2007
Gunnar Boll 29.08. Bei oP150 S kann m.E. der Hinweis auf zentrale features entfallen. Dies ist auch ohnehin mehr ein Platform-Thema. Wichtig ist nur ob ein phone über FAC's (feature access codes) auch Zugriff auf zentrale featues hat
Hello Gunnar,
If looking at optiPoint power supply and PoE classes the optiPoint 150 S is correctly reported.
I think we could also state that optiPoint 150 S is IEEE 802.3af PoE compliant (Class 2 with 3.84-6.49 W power requirements) in its wiki page (Actually it's not declared).
Then we can add the optiPoint 150 S on a PoE compliant workpoints list that will appear on the PoE wiki page once you will accept what I wrote on the PoE talk page.
Even if phased out, what's about also write down something about optiPoint 400 and optiPoint 600 ?
--Kimera 00:10, 15 November 2006 (CET)
