Views

Difference between revisions of "Talk:How to install CallBridge IP"

The Wiki of Unify contains information on clients and devices, communications systems and unified communications. - Unify GmbH & Co. KG is a Trademark Licensee of Siemens AG.

Jump to: navigation, search
(SIP and CallBridge IP relationship)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* IP Phone uses Cornet TS protocol (not SIP !)
 
* IP Phone uses Cornet TS protocol (not SIP !)
  
as a precondition to use CallBridge IP ''but'' an IP phone, no matter if belongs to CorNet-IP or SIP software family, can't use Cornet TS...because ''Cornet TS'' doesn't exist.
+
as a precondition to use CallBridge IP, could we write a sentence like:
Maybe you want to wrote ''CallBridge TS'' but, ''still'', it's not ok with those IP phones.<br\>
 
As far as I can see the only one TS provider for CorNet-IP compliant IP phones is CallBridge IP.<br\>
 
Regarding SIP...we must speak about this item (See also the talk on [http://wiki.siemens-enterprise.com/index.php/Talk:CallBridge_Collection CallBridge:Talk] page.<br\>
 
  
So, if I'm on the good road, the right sentence should be:
+
* IP phones (CorNet-IP variant only) use CallBridge IP as CorNet TSP provider.
* IP phone (CorNet-IP variant only) uses CallBridge IP as TS provider
 
  
and the ending note ''(not SIP !)'' about SIP IP Phone should be then (IMHO) verified.<br\>
+
This to underline the fact that CallBridge IP can't be (actually ?) used with SIP IP workpoints.
  
--Kimera 16:56, 17 November 2006 (CET)
+
However, the ending note ''(not SIP !)'' about SIP IP workpoints, should be clarified as well so we'll able to write down something about them and CTI.
 +
 
 +
--Kimera 23:20, 20 November 2006 (CET)

Revision as of 22:20, 20 November 2006

CallBridge IP precondition

Hi,

I read:

  • IP Phone uses Cornet TS protocol (not SIP !)

as a precondition to use CallBridge IP, could we write a sentence like:

  • IP phones (CorNet-IP variant only) use CallBridge IP as CorNet TSP provider.

This to underline the fact that CallBridge IP can't be (actually ?) used with SIP IP workpoints.

However, the ending note (not SIP !) about SIP IP workpoints, should be clarified as well so we'll able to write down something about them and CTI.

--Kimera 23:20, 20 November 2006 (CET)