Difference between revisions of "Talk:OpenStage SIP"

Revision as of 17:49, 16 December 2006

Hi all,

Just a little note: is there a rule to fix date style on the Wiki ?

I saw both dd/mm/yyyy and mm/dd/yyyy styles: have a look to Release Notes tables on optiPoint 4x0 S and OpenStage SIP, they follow two different ways.

Should be better one way only, what do you think about ?

--Kimera 11:22, 15 December 2006 (CET)

Hello How correct is to speak about firmware update on the new phones ? Will be better use only the term "Application software" and not firmware ? Are there still different software images (Application, NetBoot) to worry about when upgrade or is there only a single image file to be uploaded to those phones (.img) ? --Kimera 20:43, 15 December 2006 (CET)

Hi Kimera !

In SEBA dd/mm/yyyy for OpenStage SIP!

Danke für die Grafikbearbeitung! Frage ist es erlaubt Fotos von Siemens hier zu veröffentlichen ?

Oder wie sieht es mit den Rechten aus?

--SCCSSF 09:57, 16 December 2006 (CET)

Hi SCCSSF, So on all the Wiki page should be better use the dd/mm/yyyy date style other than mm/dd/yyyy ?
I asked this because I saw both ways and I prefear one standardized way only (It's better IMHO).

I don't understand well german, could you write me in english too ? --Kimera 11:56, 16 December 2006 (CET)

Hi Kimera

my write english is bad so some time i write in german! I understand you problem with the date! I think the best is dd/mm/yyyy.

--SCCSSF 18:35, 16 December 2006 (CET)

Hi SCCSSF, It's not a real problem, just a way to do things in a standard and common way.
I agree with you, also for me the best date style is (or should be) dd/mm/yyyy instead of mm/dd/yyyy.
Should, in your opinion, we need to contact someone else mangaing the Wiki for this little stylish-only issue ? Reach me via Messenger if you want (See my user page) --Davide.poletto 18:47, 16 December 2006 (CET)