Difference between revisions of "Talk:HiPath Xpressions Compact"
The Wiki of Unify contains information on clients and devices, communications systems and unified communications. - Unify GmbH & Co. KG is a Trademark Licensee of Siemens AG.
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi Bossekr,<br/> | Hi Bossekr,<br/> | ||
− | does actually DLI supports only the deployment of HFA (CorNet IP) clients:<br/> | + | does actually [[DLI|HiPath DLI]] supports only the deployment of '''HFA''' (CorNet IP) system clients:<br/> |
* Comfort Open P100 IP | * Comfort Open P100 IP | ||
* Comfort Open P300 IP | * Comfort Open P300 IP | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* optiClient 130 | * optiClient 130 | ||
without supporting their SIP variants ?<br/> | without supporting their SIP variants ?<br/> | ||
− | Is it a ''design limit'' or a ''temporary lack'' of workpoints '''.xml''' ''templates'' on the DLI side ?<br/> | + | Is it a ''design limit'' or a ''temporary lack'' of workpoints '''.xml''' ''templates'' on the [[DLI|HiPath DLI]] side ?<br/> |
Should this means that [[DLS|HiPath DLS]] is, in the while, still needed on HiPath system IVM equipped with a mass (or a mix) of SIP workpoints connected ?<br/> | Should this means that [[DLS|HiPath DLS]] is, in the while, still needed on HiPath system IVM equipped with a mass (or a mix) of SIP workpoints connected ?<br/> | ||
regards,<br/> | regards,<br/> | ||
[[User:Davide.poletto]] Kimera 23:04, 7 August 2007 (CEST) | [[User:Davide.poletto]] Kimera 23:04, 7 August 2007 (CEST) |
Revision as of 18:10, 18 August 2007
Hi Bossekr,
does actually HiPath DLI supports only the deployment of HFA (CorNet IP) system clients:
- Comfort Open P100 IP
- Comfort Open P300 IP
- OpenStage 20
- OpenStage 40
- OpenStage 60
- OpenStage 80
- optiPoint 410 entry
- optiPoint 410 economy
- optiPoint 410 economy plus
- optiPoint 410 standard
- optiPoint 410 advance
- optiPoint 420 economy
- optiPoint 420 economy plus
- optiPoint 420 standard
- optiPoint 420 advance
- optiPoint 600 office V5
- optiPoint WL2 professional
- optiClient 130
without supporting their SIP variants ?
Is it a design limit or a temporary lack of workpoints .xml templates on the HiPath DLI side ?
Should this means that HiPath DLS is, in the while, still needed on HiPath system IVM equipped with a mass (or a mix) of SIP workpoints connected ?
regards,
User:Davide.poletto Kimera 23:04, 7 August 2007 (CEST)