Views

Difference between revisions of "Talk:optiPoint power supply and PoE classes"

The Wiki of Unify contains information on clients and devices, communications systems and unified communications. - Unify GmbH & Co. KG is a Trademark Licensee of Siemens AG.

Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
----
 
----
 
Gosh!
 
Gosh!
I'm sorry Christian, I didn't think about a such event.
+
I'm sorry Christian, I agree 100% with your thinking.<br/>
I removed them immediately leaving only country variants as differentiators.
+
I didn't think about a such (possible) event.<br/>
In placing links to existing documentation/wiki pages, please help me in doing so.
+
I removed the Part Numbers reference immediately leaving only country variants as key differentiators for all the IP workpoint families.<br/>
Kind regards
+
I would place links to existing documentation and/or wiki pages, please help me in doing so if, in your opinion, could be an helpful information.<br/>
--Kimera 22:43, 10 December 2006 (CET)
+
I'm still learning how to write valuable informations without adding dangerous complexity...it's not simple at all.<br/>
 +
Thanks and very kind regards
 +
<br/>
 +
--Kimera 22:47, 10 December 2006 (CET)

Revision as of 21:47, 10 December 2006

Davide, I would prefer having a reference to the already existing order number documents instead of giving the power supply numbers here one by one, e.g. we might change the HW, hence creating new order numbers. Then it is difficult to maintain proper information here. regards --Christian.kaehler 21:51, 10 December 2006 (CET)


Gosh! I'm sorry Christian, I agree 100% with your thinking.
I didn't think about a such (possible) event.
I removed the Part Numbers reference immediately leaving only country variants as key differentiators for all the IP workpoint families.
I would place links to existing documentation and/or wiki pages, please help me in doing so if, in your opinion, could be an helpful information.
I'm still learning how to write valuable informations without adding dangerous complexity...it's not simple at all.
Thanks and very kind regards
--Kimera 22:47, 10 December 2006 (CET)