Difference between revisions of "Talk:optiPoint 150 S"
The Wiki of Unify contains information on clients and devices, communications systems and unified communications. - Unify GmbH & Co. KG is a Trademark Licensee of Siemens AG.
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hello Gunnar, | Hello Gunnar, | ||
| − | + | If looking at [[PoE classes of optiPoint phones]] the [[optiPoint 150 S]] is correctly reported. | |
| − | Even if phased out, what's about | + | I think we could also state that [[optiPoint 150 S]] is IEEE 802.3af PoE compliant (Class 2 with 3.84-6.49 W power requirements) in its wiki page (Actually it's not declared). |
| + | |||
| + | Then we can add the [[optiPoint 150 S]] on a PoE compliant workpoints list that will appear on the [http://wiki.siemens-enterprise.com/index.php/PoE PoE wiki page] once you will accept what I wrote on the [http://wiki.siemens-enterprise.com/index.php/Talk:PoE PoE talk page]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Even if phased out, what's about also write down something about optiPoint 400 and optiPoint 600 ? | ||
--[[User:Davide.poletto|Kimera]] 00:10, 15 November 2006 (CET) | --[[User:Davide.poletto|Kimera]] 00:10, 15 November 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 23:20, 14 November 2006
Gunnar Boll 29.08. Bei oP150 S kann m.E. der Hinweis auf zentrale features entfallen. Dies ist auch ohnehin mehr ein Platform-Thema. Wichtig ist nur ob ein phone über FAC's (feature access codes) auch Zugriff auf zentrale featues hat
Hello Gunnar,
If looking at PoE classes of optiPoint phones the optiPoint 150 S is correctly reported.
I think we could also state that optiPoint 150 S is IEEE 802.3af PoE compliant (Class 2 with 3.84-6.49 W power requirements) in its wiki page (Actually it's not declared).
Then we can add the optiPoint 150 S on a PoE compliant workpoints list that will appear on the PoE wiki page once you will accept what I wrote on the PoE talk page.
Even if phased out, what's about also write down something about optiPoint 400 and optiPoint 600 ?
--Kimera 00:10, 15 November 2006 (CET)
